The Broker's Record

Santa Cruz Real Estate Deathmatch

March 29, 2009

One thing’s for sure – it’s interesting times we live in. Whether you think the current housing crisis is the cause or a symptom of the economic meltdown in the United States and abroad, there’s no denying that there’s a great deal of uncertainty about how long this recession will last, how deep it will cut, and what this means for people looking to buy a house in Santa Cruz today.

I’ve said it several times in various postings to this blog, but I think it bears repeating: I think home prices in Santa Cruz county will continue to drop for the foreseeable future – and by that, I mean the rest of this year, at least. This is an opinion that is apparently not shared by some people, as we see buyers falling all over themselves (and other buyers) in a mad scramble for these “bargain” properties.

A few days ago, the Santa Cruz Sentinel ran a story about what homebuyers found at close to the median price of $380,000 in Santa Cruz County. I thought it was a pretty good read. I “watched” a lot of these properties come on the market and get sold, and it’s interesting to get a report from “inside” the transaction. One thing that was interesting is how many agents said their buyers received closing cost credit (typically in the 3-4% range) – I know from my own listings that this is common place, but you rarely see this in the “private remarks” section of the MLS. It’s an important bit of information – if a house is sold for $380,000 but the seller credited the buyer $12,000 for closing costs, the house really only sold for $368,000.

Another eyebrow-raiser were the anecdotes from the buyer’s Realtors, talking about the multiple offers. One agent told of showing her client “100 houses” (nice agent!) and writing up 15 offers, before finally being the winning bidder on a house on Grant Street in Santa Cruz for $412,500.

I myself have been there and seen this a lot of late. It’s not a new thing – as I mentioned a blog entry or two ago, this multiple-offer feeding-frenzy has been going on at least 18 months, I don’t see that it is more common today than it was a year or so ago – but perhaps it’s being talked about more in the media, as there is now more effort into talking up the economy rather than talking it down.

I work with a few buyers, although mostly my work these days is with the banks, listing and selling their REO assets here in Santa Cruz, but also in San Jose, Gilroy, Salinas, etc. I have some buyers who I’ve been working with for some time – we haven’t seen a hundred houses and we haven’t written 15 offers (yet!), but we’ve written up a good number of offers and haven’t yet been the winning bidder.

The day before yesterday, though, my client sent me a link to a listing which had “0 days” on market – meaning, it had popped up on the MLS only a few hours ago. I had seen it when it had come up (I send myself e-mails from my automated system for every bank-owned home that hits the market), but at the moment, I had a number of deadlines I was working to meet so I didn’t look at the particulars to see that it was really an incredible deal. When my client wrote me about it, I took a closer look. I wrote back – “Sounds like a winner, let’s go see it tomorrow, at the crack of dawn.”

The next morning at 8:30 AM, we went out to the property and took a peak. Stunningly cheap – priced well, well below market value. After only a couple of minutes at the property, we were already talking about writing it up. As fate would have it, though, it was about 4 hours more before we would actually send the offer in. And send it we did – at which point I called the listing agent, who informed me there had been four offers, all offers had submitted their “highest and best” offers, and that the bank had just chosen one of those buyers. All of that, in less than 24 hours.

It’s a bit of a mystery why a bank would price a home so low and then not give the home proper market exposure before accepting offers. Many of the banks that I work with have a 5 or 7 day minimum market time before they review offers, and that gives enough time to attract a good number of high-quality offers. Those that do not wait a few days before reviewing offers often leave quite a bit of money on the table, it seems to me.

But that’s nether here nor there. Whether a bank takes the first offer that comes along, or waits 7 days before reviewing offers, the point is this: it’s brutal out there for buyers of these “bargain” properties. The big question in my mind is, why is there such a clamor to buy something which in many cases is going to be considerably cheaper six months from now? What is driving everyone to fight tooth and nail for these properties which are still steadily dropping in value?

There’s any number of reasons, of course. Many buyers probably think that we are at the bottom of the market. You can’t time the market, after all – it’s impossible to say just when the bottom has been reached, and usually you can only tell when you are coming off it. Many buyers have just been itching to buy for years now, and finally, prices are “affordable” – and now, declining market be damned, they’re going to buy into the American Dream.

I have a theory, though, I’d like to run it by you. My theory is that there is actually very little for sale at the moment compared to the demand that’s out there. At any one time, there are only a few dozen properties listed for sale – not already in escrow – which are well priced for today’s market. Spying through the MLS, I see every house, condo, and multi-res property that hits the market – and more often than not, I say to myself: “What are these people thinking?!”

You see, most houses just aren’t priced to sell. In order to get $700,000 or $800,000 – hey, let’s face it, even $600,000! – for a house these days…the house has got to be pretty special. It’s gotta be tight, turn-key, in a good location, or have enormous and obvious upside potential. And yet, the market is flooded with houses in these price ranges…and there are no buyers for them. There would be buyers if the houses really were turn-key in fabulous locations – however, those properties are also usually priced $200,000 more than the market is now willing to pay for them.

These days, there is absolutely no shortage of buyers in the mid-county area in the $400,000-$550,000 price range. The problem is, there are almost no properties in this price range – and this is the reason why, I think, we have this Real Estate Deathmatch thing going on. There’s just very little tho choose from at the price the market is willing to pay.

Take, for example, the listing at 3365 Branciforte Drive. I am the co-listing agent of this property. This property had actually been listed by my office for a loong time – since May of last year. But then, it was a short sale, and started out at $799,000. Actually, when it started out, I don’t think it was a short sale – but as the months went by, the price was reduced until finally the owner owed more on it than the market would pay. It was in contract as a short sale at the time the property got foreclosed on – but there was no stampede of buyers vying for it at the time.

Why? Because nobody likes a short sale. Once that property became a bank-owned foreclosure listed at $459,900 – woah. Many buyers avoid short sales because so few of them are successful. For example, this very same property – it was in contract as a short sale and then…it got foreclosed on anyway; the buyer had full loan approval and was all set to close. The buyer had spent hundreds of dollars on an appraisal and a septic inspection, all for naught. Who needs that kind of aggravation, right?

This property ended up getting 10 offers on it – this is being sold by one of the banks that lets properties sit on the market seven days before reviewing offers. It should go ‘pending’ probably on Monday, after the bank chooses the winning offer. And all this madness over a house with serious foundation issues. True, it’s got a nice lot and it’s in the Happy Valley school district, but this house really needs a lot of work.

But buyers are willing to take it on- because there’s just not a lot out there in this price range. Soon, though, the now-healthy pool of buyers even in this price range will start to shrink. Unemployment continues to rise, and lenders continue to tighten lending standards – and that’s a fatal one-two punch that even historically low interest rates will not be able to combat fully.

So if you’re one of these buyers who writes 15 offers and misses out on every one – if you are battered and bloodied by this Real Estate Deathmatch that’s going on – take heart. This is just the Universe’s way of telling you that the time for you to buy hasn’t quite arrived. Time is on your side – if the deathmatch is too brutal, there’s no harm on sitting the sidelines a while longer, so you can heal up for future bouts to come.

Posted by SantaCruzBroker at 10:00am
No Comments »

Santa Cruz at Market Bottom? Some Say Yes, I Say No

March 18, 2009

I popped in my office this evening to pick up a commission check, and as I passed by a colleague’s desk, I happened to notice a photocopy of the front page of today’s Santa Cruz sentinel sitting there. I had actually seen the headline news flitter across my screen this morning, thanks to Twitter and Growl (very cool). However, I didn’t have a chance to read the article, and I didn’t see the sub-headline: “We are at Bottom says one Watsonville Realtor.” Or some such eye-bait.

One thing that’s interesting is that the median price the Santa Cruz Sentinel used, $380,000, is quite a bit lower than my own figure of $429,000. $380K is pretty low for these parts, but an almost $50K discrepancy between my numbers and those of Gary Gangnes (an oft-quoted source of local market data) is notable. But I won’t quibble with Gary, I think he’s been tallying the numbers since I was learning to ride a tricycle.

The exact median price for sales in February ‘09 doesn’t interest me so much – the fact that it’s a lot lower than February ‘08 or even January of ‘09 is very interesting – the fact that we’re heading, still, in a downward direction seems inescapable.

However, one Realtor at least (and one who should know – the president of the Watsonville Association of Realtors) is ready to escape this, by proclaiming that in the south county, at least, “We’ve hit our bottom … in single family.”

She brings up a few vague anecdotes, like she has more buyers than properties right now. And that’s the criteria for knowing when we are at the bottom, when one Realtor has more buyers than properties? That’s not real hard thinking. She also cites how we’re seeing multiple offers. Fact is, we have been seeing multiple offers for well over a year now on these bargain-basement properties in Watsonville – and pretty much anywhere in California where bank-owned foreclosures are sold several percent cheaper than competing properties – these properties attract multiple offers and sell quickly. It’s not a new phenomenon, it’s been going on at least 18 months I’d say.

The fact is, I’ve got a number of listings in Watsonville myself. Do I have multiple offers on all of them? Hardly. Certainly, sometimes there’s a crazy feeding frenzy of 10+ offers on these properties. I listed a new home last night in San Jose, and I’ve had 20 phone calls on it today at least, I’m sure there will be multiple offers on that one. Does that mean the market has stabilized, that we have hit bottom?

No, it means that this is the cheapest home to sell in that neighborhood in that condition in many years, and there are buyers for it, lots of them. But when this home sells, the next one to come on the market will come on at a lower price, or at least, it’ll almost surely sell at a lower price. That’s because we’re in a declining market.

Here’s an anecdote that tells me we we are not at bottom. I have a listing at 90 Arista Lane in Watsonville, it’s 14 years old, 3 bedrooms, 1.5 bathrooms, on a quiet dead-end street in the center of town, close to everything. All the homes on Arista Lane and Arista Court are pretty much identical. My own listing is not in bad shape at all, except it does have some unusual choices for interior paint color.

The house across the street from this, 87 Arista Lane, is what you’d call a “model match.” Pretty much – I didn’t go into 87 Arista when it was on the market, but from what I can tell on the MLS from the pictures, the choice of paint colors and level of amenities in this home was about on par with my listing. 87 Arista was listed in October of 2008 for $299,900, and in November of ‘08 it went down to $279,900 before closing escrow on January 2 of ‘09 for $260,000. There was no mention made of the seller having paid the buyer any closing cost credits – but not all Realtors mention the closing cost credits in the private comments when marking the property sold (though they should).

And then, a scant two months later, my own listing comes on with an asking price of $250,000 – that’s 3.8% less than the sale price of a very very comparable property which closed just two months earlier…and I’m on the market eight days, and I’m standing in a field of chirping crickets. Not an offer, and only a handful of phone calls. Where are all these buyers, loan approval letters in hand, waiting to buy my listing that could possibly be had for maybe 6-7% less than this comp which closed just a tad over two months ago?

Let’s say though that 90 Arista Lane does get a full price offer (very unlikely if there’s only one buyer making an offer), and it sells for $250,000. By the time it closes escrow, it’d be about 3 months past the sale of the last comp, meaning the market will have dropped about 1.26% per month (for this particular type of home). That’s an annual rate of 30% drop. And, strangely enough – the year-over-year price decline (February 2008 to February 2009) in Watsonville was…30%. But mind you, we are now looking ahead to March, so what we’re seeing is…the market is still headed down, at about the same rate as it’s been going down for the last year.

And another thing! Before I close out this little missive, I’d like to take exception to another thing in the Sentinel article, that homes are being sold “at discounts of 30 to 50 percent.” Nothing could be farther from the truth. The truth is, these homes are being sold at a loss of 30 to 60 (yes – sixty) percent from their all-time peak values. In fact, these homes which receive multiple offers typically end up selling for more than asking price – so does that mean that anyone who pays more than list price is paying more than the property is worth?

No, it doesn’t mean that at all. It means that the list price was below market value, and the market recognized that and enough offers were generated to bump the price back up to market value – or perhaps a bit above market value, or perhaps a good bit below. But not too far below – if in fact you were able to buy a home for 10% below true market value, you could not do a thing to the property, then turn around and sell that property to someone else the next day for 10% more than you paid for it. I can name few examples where that has happened here after purchasing the home “retail” on the MLS in recent memory.

Since Paul Harvey is no longer with us to say it, I’ll have to: “So now you know…the REST of the story!”

Posted by SantaCruzBroker at 8:29pm
No Comments »

It’s Nigh Time to Buy in Santa Cruz

March 14, 2009

A few days ago, after about a month’s silence, I wrote something of a “doom and gloom” blog entry about Santa Cruz real estate – in fact, I’m proud to say, the entry was even picked up on the HousingDoom.com blog, which I read now and again to stay in touch with my darker side. You see, I felt the need to vent about what I see as a lot of hype by various individuals and organizations saying what a great time it is to buy some real estate.

As I’ve said before, it may in fact be a good time for you to buy some real estate here in Santa Cruz. In any market, it really depends on your situation. All I’m saying is, don’t buy into the hype – positive or negative – about the current real estate market. Do your own research, make up your own mind. Make an informed decision, and be prepared to live with the consequences.

It may be that you decide that it makes sense for you to buy some real estate right now in Santa Cruz. Over a hundred people bought property in the county in February – and did all of these 100 people make a horrible mistake? Indubitably, some of them did. Just as indubitably, some of them made very shrewd investment decisions which will yield rich rewards down the road. After all, let’s not forget the golden rule of real estate: you make money when you buy, you reap the cash when you sell.

If you were to ask any my buyer clients about what I’ve been telling them in person as we’re out looking a property, I bet they’ll all tell you I said this: “Be patient, time is on your side.” I have some clients with whom we’ve been looking, on and off, for many months. With each passing month, the properties that are in their price ranges just keep getting better, and better still. The problem right now isn’t so much the price of the homes – it’s the idea that a better home for the same price is waiting just around the corner.

The truth is, while the median price in Santa Cruz county is now down to a “wow I can afford that” $429,000 – there are not many of these homes for sale in the central parts of the county (e.g. Santa Cruz, Soquel, Capitola, Aptos); the sales are for the most part happening in areas where the sellers are more motivated – and that means, the areas with a high percentage of foreclosures, or distressed homeowners who need to (try to) sell quickly to avoid foreclosure.

However, the sharp rise in unemployment, rising foreclosure rates among Alt-A and Prime borrowers, coupled with pent-up seller demand (sellers who really want to sell, but have been waiting for the market to go back up) means that every day, prices of real estate even in prime locations continues to drop down to where it is within reach of the average Jane who has a good credit score, low debt, and a good enough, fully-documentable income. Jane, your time is coming.

I ended my previous blog entry saying:

It’s quite a bit more challenging to buy real estate today that you won’t regret having paid so much for a year from now.

Buyer’s remorse is, of course, a terrible thing. I think you can have buyer’s remorse in a market even that is appreciating strongly, because remorse can come from a variety of factors. Feeling that you have overpaid, or regretting that you didn’t wait to buy as you watch prices in the neighborhood into which you have bought keep tumbling lower can be, to be sure, nauseating.

For that reason, I caution my buyers: be patient. Wait, until you find the house that you love, at a price you can comfortably afford. This is not the market, or the economic cycle, in which you want to be stretching. If the house you want to buy is a stretch – don’t buy it now, this isn’t the time. If you wait just a bit, a very similar house will come on the market in another six months which won’t be such a stretch.

Even then, “six months from now,” I wouldn’t be surprised if prices keep right on dropping. Might you still be a happy homeowner, even so, having not bought at the rock bottom of the cycle? If you are patient, and you buy the right house, in the right location, that fits your lifestyle, your plans, and your budget comfortably, then I expect that you’ll continue being happy in your new home, even should it drop in value over the next year or two. And, down the road, you may be pleasantly surprised to find that the house you bought because you loved it and it was affordable at the time turned out to have been a great investment. Imagine that.

Posted by Administrator at 2:47pm
No Comments »

Santa Cruz Realtor and Devil’s Advocate

March 10, 2009

I find myself doing it all too much, but I feel compelled to do it again…I must apologize for not keeping my blog updated. There’s a few reasons for that – no excuses, of course, just unvarnished reasons. One biggie is that I am completely and utterly swamped with work, and while my blog is actually very important to me, it falls into the “important but not urgent” quadrant of McCovey’s “first things first.”

Another reason I haven’t written anything is that I don’t know quite what to say! Every day, I read the newspapers and the blogs and e-zines and and I watch TV and listen to podcasts, absorbing all the real estate news that there is, and I try to make sense of it all, I try to wrap my head around it and come to some kind of conclusion that I feel certain enough about to write up a blog entry, sharing my thoughts with you all…

I guess I just keep looking for that ray of sunshine. I think you can read lots of sunny Realtor blogs, about how great a market it is for buyers right now. That may be true, but I’m not buyin’ it. I don’t think it’s that great of a market out there for buyers, because there simply isn’t that much to chose from. Not here in Santa Cruz, anyway. Just check out my Santa Cruz Real Estate Sales Data page and you’ll see.

If you’ve read my newsletter, you know the facts – that the sales volume has risen in Santa Cruz for the eighth month in a row. No if, ands, or buts about it – that’s good. However, that goes along with, I believe, eight months of declining home prices. The Santa Cruz county median in February 2009 was down to $429,000 for a single-family residence. I believe that at the height of the market a couple-few years back, the median was around $834,000.

The optimists in the crowd will also point to months of falling inventory – this time last year, there were 989 single-family residences for sale in the county, and now we’re down to 803. With a monthly sales rate of 87 units in February, we’re looking at a 9.22 month supply, and a year ago, we were looking at a13.36 month supply of homes for sale. The theory is that as the supply tightens and demand increases, prices will stabilize.

Except, of course, that hasn’t been happening these past eight months. Sales have been rising (the “demand”) and the inventory has been shrinking (the “supply”) – but prices have continued to drop, steadily.

I think an important thing to consider in all of this is that the inventory is not shrinking so much because of the high sales volume, but rather it is shrinking also because many sellers are letting their listings expire, or just outright canceling them, taking their homes off the market. Sellers are giving up in frustration, and this is a big reason why the inventory continues to shrink.

I feel this contributes to a false impression of the real estate of the market. I think there are a lot of sellers who want to sell, but right now they are sitting pat. Many of them will not be able to sit pat forever, and will eventually bring their properties back on to the market – at still lower prices. I think there is a huuuuge shadow inventory out there of would-be sellers who, one day, will be pushed by circumstances back onto the market.

Perhaps they’ll lose their jobs – after all, California unemployment now tops 10.1%. In Santa Cruz, I believe unemployment is now 12.6% and in Santa Clara county (the Silicon Valley, the fountain from which much of our wealth flows) is now at 9.4%. Perhaps they’ll just fear they’ll lose their jobs, and want to sell their property and get out of their crushing mortgage payments before they are forced into the unemployment lines.

Where am I going with all of this? Nowhere in particular – that’s why I haven’t written a blog entry in a while! I hardly know what to make of it all. I will say this, though: don’t buy into the idea that this is a great time to buy. It’s a great time to buy over-priced real estate. It’s quite a bit more challenging to buy real estate today that you won’t regret having paid so much for a year from now. After all, when Warren Buffet says the US Economy has fallen off a cliff, it may perhaps be taken as a harbinger for our local real estate values as well.

Posted by SantaCruzBroker at 11:14pm
1 Comment »